Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Home No. 73: Personal hygiene issues in the lab — Where to draw the line

Apr 25
2011

No. 73: Personal hygiene issues in the lab — Where to draw the line

Posted by: admin in

Tagged in: Untagged 


Sponsored Message


Sign Up to receive free weekly articles like these

Personal hygiene issues in the lab — Where to draw the line

Reader question: We’ve been getting periodic complaints about the personal hygiene of a staff member. And I’ve had a “difficult conversation” about it three times in the past eight or nine months. After the discussion, he cleans up his act for a few months, and then reverts to hygiene lapses until the complaints start, and I have to talk to him again. He’s also said that he thinks he should go out on disability leave for depression — yet he always gets his job done. He’s been with us for years and has done good work for us. I feel forced to exercise progressive discipline, but that will likely mean he’s going to be out the door soon. Any suggestions I should follow short of progressive discipline? Any way to salvage him?

Expert Comments: You may be tempted to keep “muddling through.” One more conversation may buy you another month or two of cleanliness. But this will continue to be a distraction to you and continue to disrupt others in the lab.

Here are some potential next steps:

  • You could assign someone to report to you any time he has a hygiene issue as soon as he arrives. If he has not met institution standards, you can send him home to properly clean up. Tell him proper hygiene isn’t an option. At many institutions there are showers on site, so you could also send the person there instead of home. This may not be the best approach, however, because “micro-managing” someone’s hygiene is frustrating and distracting and doesn’t address the underlying issue.
  • Progressive discipline likely will not work. If the person suffers from a significant depression, he will simply lose his job. At this point you should get your Human Resources (HR) department involved.

    There are larger issues than saving one person — namely, your organization probably has a personal hygiene policy, and part of your job as supervisor is to apply it. The person has also indicated he might be disabled by depression — you should have called HR as soon as the employee said that. Disability determinations, and referrals for help, are best handled by HR.

Your best approach would be to intervene through an employee assistance program (EAP), if your organization has one. You obviously want to keep the person on staff, but recognize that you may not be able to unless the underlying depression issue is addressed. His hygiene hasn’t been a problem during his past service, so something within him has changed recently. He could be doing the best he can, but his personal problems have overwhelmed him.

If the person has clinical depression, that's a real medical condition, and it could be a disability. An EAP can help him get the treatment he needs. And getting HR involved can help make sure that your company is protected from any potential legal issues, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Under the ADA, a person must be able to do their job with or without accommodation. This person appears to be able to do his job because he works every day and performs well. Although his hygiene is a problem, he’s unlikely to qualify for disability under Social Security or a private insurance plan. Perhaps he’s in the early stages of clinical depression, and with some medical care, he can start to get better.

Expert comments by an HR executive with a southeastern research university and Robert Koenisberg of Robert Koenisberg Law Office in New York, N.Y.

Comments (5)
PI
written by TK, April 22, 2011
Assuming you've explained his impact on others -- subjecting them to unpleasant smells -- and his refusal to respect others' boundaries regarding their need not to be assaulted by such smells, I have limited sympathy for him. I think you should go ahead and exercise the discipline policy. Perhaps the reason this has gone on and on is he knows that the worst that can happen if he fails to bathe is that you and he will have another nice talk. He's taking advantage of your good nature. Set a clear boundary about what's acceptable and enforce it. If he chooses to fire himself, know you gave him more leeway than most.
...
written by RJ, April 26, 2011
I totally disagree with TK. If this is an employee with a good track record and is an asset to your organization, getting HR involved is the best solution. Good employees are hard to find and worth saving. Sounds like this person has had some personal tramatic event(s) that have triggered this behavior. Depression, just like any other medical condition can be treated. Get the person the help they need so they can continue being an asset to your organization.
Prof
written by David E. Harrison, April 26, 2011
Ah, the good old return to the days when employee are ill, you discipline them until they are better!

What you described may well be illness. The expert covered part - "If the person has clinical depression, that's a real medical condition, and it could be a disability. An EAP can help him get the treatment he needs. And getting HR involved can help make sure that your company is protected from any potential legal issues, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)."

But I think you need to START with the medical experts. Iust one example - untreated diabetes can cause unpleasant smells and recurrent depression due to metabolic defects - it is easy to treat once diagnosed!

First make sure there is no medical problem.
Use your HR to make sure you follow all the correct legal procedures to get this person checked to be certain there is no medical problem before you start to discipline!
...
written by Anchors Aweigh Assoc Prof, April 26, 2011
When I was instructor in science at the Naval Acad, these scenarios were so far away we couldn't dream they ever occurred. The basic question is this" Is the university runing a "halfay house"--or is everybody there to get some work done?. If the lab worker has a problem with personal hygiene,he/she needs either a mentor or a psychologist. Neither, IMHO, is the role of the PI. You get a lot of lazy louts at the uni because--they are tolerated there. They even appeal to a cetain subset of undegrads as the personification of delayed rebellion against "parental figures". They should be kicked out immediately. not least because of the horrible example they are setting for younger trainees. But if there is true clinical depressson,or there was perhaps gross deprivation of childhood instructon in societal norms, Icould see referal to campus mental health or possibly HR. But please don't accept them "as is". You are not doing yourself or your colleagues a favor--and you are not helping the deviant for later life.
...
written by Victor, May 03, 2011
One of the comments says: "I think you should go ahead and exercise the discipline policy. Perhaps the reason this has gone on and on is he knows that the worst that can happen if he fails to bathe is that you and he will have another nice talk. He's taking advantage of your good nature. Set a clear boundary about what's acceptable and enforce it." This would be "nail on the head" if it were, as in previous discussion threads, about texting or choice of clothes. However, I doubt anybody would opt to stink as a matter of lifestyle choices. There is a slight chance that nobody told him before, and he isn't smart enough to understand matters himself. Then a brief comment made by a handsome member of opposite sex would suffice. Otherwise, it is a psychiatric issue.
Having said this, I cannot but agree with the previous comment: whatever the reason, there must be a zero-tolerance policy.

Write comment
smaller | bigger


Write the displayed characters